Bravo Fleet v. James Raza (JAG-002)
The Defendant, James Raza, is charged with the following violations as defined by Section 4 of the Magistrate Code.
- 1x Discrimination (Plea: None)
No member shall discriminate against another member in regards to promotions, medal awards, praise and acknowledgment, or positions on the basis of real-life political affiliation, gender, race, color, age, disability, creed, heritage, nationality or sexual orientation.
- 1x Disreputable Behavior (Plea: None)
No member shall partake in any action that brings disrepute onto themselves, the fleet as a whole, or any independent fleet, ship, or individual member. Actions include those done by a member, either within or outside traditional Bravo Fleet activities and communication channels, that reflect on the above parties, such as: treason, acts to sabotage, stealing of property, or any conduct forbidden by these articles.
See Evidence above
This ban was put into place at a time when Bravo Fleet did not have an active judicial system. Given the severity of the ban from a similar organization to Bravo Fleet, the Bravo Fleet Magistrate has determined that the ban should remain in place.
The Bravo Fleet Magistrate (QuodEroSpero) has reached the following verdict with regards to the Defendant (James Raza).
- The Defendant is found GUILTY on 1 count of Discrimination.
- The Defendant is found GUILTY on 1 count of Disreputable Behavior.
Defendant's SentenceA summary of the Defendant's sentence, as defined by Section 5 and Section 6 of the Magistrate Code.
The Defendant’s ban from engaging in any activity with Bravo Fleet remains in effect.